Budgeting as a Sustainable Mechanism for Organizing Business Processes in the AIC of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Objective – to substantiate the expediency of budgeting business processes as a tool for increasing the efficiency of enterprises in the agro-industrial complex of the republic and to propose a process-oriented model for account-analytical formation and planning of the budget. Methods – a systems approach to revealing the relationship between business mechanisms, budget funds, and managing their dynamics when assessing the role of the agricultural sector in the economy; structural analysis to define financial regulation objects, compare planned indicators with actual results, and identify imbalances when determining control procedures; modeling to build a process regulation system in agribusiness. Results – the necessity of transitioning from general financial coordination to the administration of individual business cycles is demonstrated: supply, production, storage, processing, sales, financing, administrative support, and investment development. A logical chain “business process – budget – actual data – variance – monitoring – management decision” has been formed. It is proposed to consider each stage as an independent object of forecasting, accounting, control, and performance, linking target metrics with actual data and responsibility of executors. The practical significance of this principle lies in the ability to localize sources of adverse variances, timely adjust limits and resource allocation, and increase the validity of administrative decisions under conditions of price volatility and the dependence of agricultural production on natural and climatic factors. Conclusions – structurally organized financial flows enhance cost transparency, control over the use of resources, ensure comparability of planned and actual parameters, and create an information base for prompt response to inconsistencies and discrepancies. Their implementation allows integrating budgeting, management accounting, and internal control into a single mechanism aimed at increasing the sustainability of Kazakhstan’s agricultural formations, improving the quality of internal reporting, distributing responsibilities, and taking action on specific business operations.

1. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ agroönerkäsıptık keshenın damytudyñ 2021–2030 jyldarğa arnalğan tū-jyrymdamasyn bekitu turaly [On approval of the Concept for the development of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2021–2030] (2022). Available at: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/moa/documents/details/274531?lang=ru (date of access: 18.06.2026) [in Kazakh].

2. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar agenttıgınıñ Ūlttyq statistika bürosy. 2025 jylğy qañtar–jeltoqsandağy öndırıs ädısymen jalpy ışkı önım [Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Gross domestic product by production method in January–December 2025] (2026). Available at: https://www.stat.gov.kz/ru/industries/economy/national-accounts/publications/306161/ (date of access: 18.06.2026) [in Kazakh].

3. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar agenttıgınıñ Ūlttyq statistika bürosy. Auyl, orman, añşylyq jäne balyq şaruaşylyğy statistikasy [Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Agriculture, forestry, hunting and fisheries statistics] (2026). Available at: https://www.stat.gov.kz/ru/industries/businessstatistics/stat-forrest-villagehunt-fish/ (date of access: 18.06.2026) [in Kazakh].

4. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Strategialyq josparlau jäne reformalar agenttıgınıñ Ūlttyq statistika bürosy. 2025 jylğa Qazaqstan Respublikasyndağy mal şaruaşylyğyn damytudyñ negızgı körsetkışterı [Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Main indicators of livestock development in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2025] (2026). Available at: https://www.stat.gov.kz/ru/industries/businessstatistics/stat-forrest-village-hunt-fish/publications/480970/ (date of access: 18.06.2026) [in Kazakh].

5. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Auyl şaruaşylyğy ministrlıgı. 2026 jylğy egıs nauqanyn qarjylandyruğa 1,3 mynñan astam ötınım tüstı [Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. More than 1.3 thousand applications received for financing the 2026 sowing campaign] (2026). Available at: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/moa/press/news/details/1131706?lang=ru (date of access: 18.06.2026) [in Kazakh].

6. Bergmann, M., Brück, C., Schwering, A. & Knauer, T. (2020). Digitization of the budgeting process: determinants of the use of business analytics and its effect on satisfaction with the budgeting process. Journal of Management Control, 31 (1–2), 25–54 [in English].

7. Armitage, H.M., Lane, D. & Webb, A. (2020). Budget Development and Use in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Field Investigation. Accounting Perspectives, 19 (3), 205–240 [in English].

8. Gottlieb, U., Hansson, H. & Johed, G. (2021). Institutionalised management accounting and control in farm businesses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37 (2), 101153 [in English].

9. Iakovidis, D., Gadanakis, Y. & Park, J. (2023). Farmer and Adviser Perspectives on Business Planning and Control in Mediterranean Agriculture: Evidence from Argolida, Greece. Agriculture, 13 (2), 450 [in English].

10. Bila, J. & Bilyi, A. (2024). Problematic issues of management accounting in the agrarian enterprises. Herald of Economics, 4, 155–166 [in English].

11. Potryvaieva, N., Dubinina, M., Cheban, Yu., Syrtseva, S. & Luhova, O. (2024). Digitalisation of accounting of agricultural enterprises: National and international experience. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28 (4), 41–53 [in English].

12. Vlasov, V. (2024). Peculiarities of management accounting of costs for marketing and sales in agricultural enterprises. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, 3, 16–21 [in English].

13. Analytical aspects of budgeting in the agro-industrial complex of Kazakhstan (2025). Economic Annals-XXI, 214 (3-4), 49–57 [in English].

14. Byudzhetirovanie kak instrument upravlencheskogo ucheta i ego svyaz’ s vnutrennim kontrolem v agrarnyh formirovaniyah [Budgeting as a tool of management accounting and its connection with internal control in agricultural formations] (2023). Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk – Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 18 (1), 125–140 [in Russian].

15. Enjolras, G., Madiès, P. & Yue, H. (2025). The influence of accounting practices on financial performance: Evidence from French farms. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26 (5), 930–958 [in English].

16. Pyagai, A.A., Bespaeva, R.S. & Naukenova, B.N. (2023). Prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’ Respubliki Kazahstan: kriterii i indikatory [Food security of the Republic of Kazakhstan: criteria and indicators]. Problemy agrorynka - Problems of AgriMarket, 4, 13–26 [in Russian].

17. Yesımhan, G. & Alybaev, D.B. (2024). Naryqtyq transformaciya jağdaıynda auyl şaruaşylyğy öndırısın qarjylandyrudyñ ūjymdastyruşylyq-ėkonomikalyq tetıgı [Organizational and economic mechanism of agricultural production financing under market transformation]. Agrarlyq naryq problemalary - Problems of AgriMarket, 2, 78–88 [in Kazakh].