Crop production in Kazakhstan: performance and diversification instruments

Under the conditions of the need to diversify Kazakhstan’s economy and ensure its sustainable development, the importance of the crop production sector is increasing as one of the key drivers of structural transformation.

The objective – is to determine the logic for improving the crop production sector through enhanced efficiency, stability, and innovation processes. The object of the study is the set of regional agricultural systems that differ in terms of their resource base.

Methods – comparative regional analysis, calculation of average annual growth rates, interpretation of physical volume indices, and structural comparison of performance indicators reflecting changes in productivity were employed to identify spatial differences among regions, assess the dynamics of key parameters, determine the actual increase in production intensity while excluding price effects, and evaluate productivity levels.

The application of these methods makes it possible to identify regional differences resulting from the expansion of the resource base as well as the acceleration of technological transformation.

Results reveal heterogeneity that extends beyond territorial differences and takes the form of structural differentiation. Two development models are identified, differing in terms of production growth and performance efficiency. Some regions demonstrate balanced development trajectories based on technological modernization and increased production intensity, whereas others expand production volumes without transforming their production base. This creates an asymmetry in which quantitative growth generates only a short-term effect that does not evolve into balanced development. It is substantiated that the nature of development is determined by the degree of technological adoption and organizational modernization.

Conclusions indicate the expediency of shifting to an innovation-oriented model focused on the modernization of the agrarian sector. Strengthening the role of digital technologies, diversification, and institutional support creates the prerequisites for efficient and high-quality development. Urgent attention is also required to address environmental degradation, which leads to the deterioration of land resources, as well as to reduce losses occurring during the production, storage, and marketing stages of crop products. 

1. Xing, Y., Wang, X. (2024). Precision agriculture and water conservation strategies for sustainable crop production in arid regions. Plants, 13(22), 3184. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13223184 [in English].

2. Conrad, C., Usman, M., Morper-Busch, L., Schönbrodt-Stitt, S. (2020). Remote sensingbased assessments of land use, soil and vegetation status, crop production and water use in irrigation systems of the Aral Sea Basin: A review. Water Security, 10, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100078 [in English].

3. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Strategiyalyq josparlau zhane reformalar agenttiginin Ulttyq statistika burosy [Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan] (2026). Available at: https://www.stat.gov.kz/ru/ (date of access: 06.03.2026) [in Kazakh].

4. Raihan, A., Tuspekova, A. (2022). Dynamic impacts of economic growth, energy use, urbanization, agricultural productivity, and forested area on carbon emissions: New insights from Kazakhstan. World Development Sustainability, 1, 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100019 [in English].

5. Akhmetova, G.Z., Baineyeva, P.T., Yessirkepova, A.M., Alzhanova, A.A. (2025). Attaining sustainable enhancement in crop production practices in the Turkestan region: A review of the potential of technological innovations. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 6(1), 556-576. https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i1.1380 [in English].

6. Batmunkh, A., Nugroho, A., Fekete-Farkas, M., Lakner, Z. (2022). Global challenges and responses: Agriculture, economic globalization, and environmental sustainability in Central Asia. Sustainability, 14 (4), 2455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042455 [in English].

7. Qin, Y.-F., He, J., Wei, M., Du, X. (2022). Challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Central Asia: Status and prospect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106200 [in English].

8. Şengül, S., Yıldız, H., Canbay, Ş. (2025). International integration and agricultural productivity in Kazakhstan: A Fourier ARDL approach. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies (2025). Available at: https://www.emerald.com (date of access: 12.03.2026). https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-052025-0208 [in English].

9. Dimitrijević, M.S. (2023). Technological progress in the function of productivity and sustainability of agriculture: The case of innovative countries and the Republic of Serbia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 13, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100856 [in English].

10. Blakeney, M. (2022). Agricultural innovation and sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(5), 2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052698 [in English].

11. Finger, R. (2023). Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 50(4), 1277–1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021 [in English].

12. Kussaiynov, T., Mussina, G., Tokenova, S., Mambetova, S. (2023). Production diversification as a tool for agricultural risk management: The case of Northern Kazakhstan. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 210. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.210 [in English].

13. Akramkhanov, A., Akbarov, A., Umarova, S., Le, Q.B. (2022). Agricultural livelihood types and type-specific drivers of crop production diversification: Evidence from Aral Sea Basin region. Sustainability, 15(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010065 [in English].

14. Sousa, R.D., Boranbayeva, A., Satpayeva, Z., Gassanova, A. (2021). Management of successful technology transfer in agriculture: The case of Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.40 [in English].

15. Djoumessi, Y. (2021). What innovations impact agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa? Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 5, 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100228 [in English].

16. Davis, B., de la O Campos, A.P., Farrae, M., Winters, P. (2024). Whither the agricultural productivity-led model? Reconsidering resilient and inclusive rural transformation in the context of agrifood systems. Global Food Security, 41, 100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.1008 12 [in English].

17. Reckling, M., Watson, C., Whitbread, A., Helming, K. (2023). Diversification for sustainable and resilient agricultural landscape systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43, 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00898-5 [in English].