Agricultural sector of Kazakhstan: focus on innovative development
https://doi.org/10.46666/2023-1.2708-9991.02
Abstract
The goal is to show the importance of innovative technologies that contribute to the development of agricultural sector of Kazakhstan.
Methods – objectivism, logical-methodological approach, phenomenalism.
Results – as the authors note, today it is obvious that creation of new and modernization of existing industries requires the use of the latest technology and equipment. On this basis, it is possible not only to ensure food security of the republic, but also to fully realize export potential of agricultural sector of economy. Large innovative projects are being intensively developed and implemented to increase the potential of agro-industrial complex. The main constraining factors for increasing innovative activity at present are as follows: the lack of sufficient volumes of production of domestic competitive agricultural products and products of their processing on the world market; low level of the effective demand from agribusiness; underdevelopment of the innovation-conducting infrastructure “from science to producer”; non–compliance of the material and technical base of Kazakhstani agro-industrial production with new economic and production requirements; high cost of innovation. The article discusses the Fitbit technology; various devices, platforms and remote sensing based on artificial intelligence; vertical farming.
Conclusions – the authors state that modernization of the country's AIC in the future is robotization. It is substantiated that the State should legally and economically motivate the introduction of autonomous robots. For example, the programs for the development of agriculture in the Republic of Kazakhstan can be based on robotization concepts through the use of techno logies such as the Verdant Robotics weeding device. Particular attention should be paid to the formation of regulatory and legal mechanisms that facilitate the flow of innovations into agricultural sector, as well as public support for them, organization of an effective system capable of concentrating investment resources in priority areas, and the creation of conditions for training of qualified personnel. This proves the relevance and timeliness of scientific developments in the proposed direction.
About the Authors
O. A. AbraliyevKazakhstan
Onalbek А. Abraliyev; Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor; Professor of the Department of Management
050059 Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty
G. S. Sugirova
Kazakhstan
Gulmira S. Sugirova; Candidate of Economic Sciences; Acting Assistant Professor of the Department of Management
050059 Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty
S. Velesco
Germany
Serge Velesco; Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor; Professor
Mittweida
References
1. Orsini, A. & Kavvatha, E. (2021). EU Environmental Governance: Current and Future Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge, 260.
2. Lenschow, A. (2012). Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 256.
3. Ferraris, L. (2020). The pursuit of sustainable agriculture in EU free trade agreements. Wageningen: Wageningen Aca- demic Publishers, 288.
4. Swinnen, J. & Knops, L. (2014). Land, Labour and Capital Markets in European Agriculture: Diversity Under a Common Policy. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Stu- dies, 373.
5. Agency for Strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Bureau of National statistics (2022). Statistics of agriculture, forestry, hunting and fisheries. Available at: https://www.stat.gov.kz/api/getFile/?docId=ESTAT443407&lang=ru (date of access: 01.11.2022).
6. Bhatnagar, R., Tripathi, N.K. & Bhat- nagar, N. (2022). The Digital Agricultural Revolution: Innovations and Challenges in Agriculture through Technology Disruptions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 496.
7. Vence (2022). Virtual Fencing for Cattle and Livestock Management System. Available at: https://vence.io/ (date of access: 01.11.2022).
8. Trapview (2022). Clear intelligence, smart reporting and reliable forecasting on pest situation in every corner of your field. Available at: https:// trapview.com/ (date of access: 01.11.2022).
9. Dahlstrom, N. (2022). Tractor Wars: John Deere, Henry Ford, International Harvester, and the Birth of Modern Agriculture. Dallas, TX: Matt Holt Books, 288.
10. Kerry, R. & Escola, A. (2021). Sensing Approaches for Precision Agriculture. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 415.
11. Information Resources Management Association (2018). Computer Vision: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 253.
12. Frazier, A. E. & Singh, K. K. (2021). Fundamentals of Capturing and Processing Drone Imagery and Data. Abingdon: CRC Press, 385.
13. EarthSense (2023) EarthSense Agri- cultural Intelligence. Available at: https://www. earthsense.co/ (date of access: 01.11.2022).
14. Tate, R.L. (2020). Soil Microbiology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 592.
15. Sugitha, T.C.K., Binodh, A.K. & Rama- samy, K. (2021). Soil Metagenomics. Abingdon: CRC Press, 276.
16. Takagaki, M., Niu, G. & Kozai, T. (2019). Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production. London: Academic Press, 516.
17. Goto, E., Son, J.E. & Kacira, M. (2022). Innovative Technologies for Vertical Farming. Lausanne: Frontiers Media, 185.
18. Johan, S. & John, M. (2020). COVID-19 and global food security. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute, 144.
19. Verdant Robotics (2022). The most advanced multi-action robotic farming implement, designed for superhuman farming. Available at: https://www.verdantrobotics.com/ (date of access: 01.11.2022).
Review
For citations:
Abraliyev O.A., Sugirova G.S., Velesco S. Agricultural sector of Kazakhstan: focus on innovative development. Problems of AgriMarket. 2023;(1):23-31. https://doi.org/10.46666/2023-1.2708-9991.02