Personal subsidiary plots of Damsinsky rural district of Akmola region: analysis of agricultural production

The goal is to show the importance and consider the current state of agricultural production in personal subsidiary plots of the Damsinsky rural district of Akmola region.

Methods – system-structural and system-functional approaches to the study of agricultural production in the households of the district, which requires the use of various methods of scientific analysis: comparative, statistical, mathematical and economic, etc.

Results – the authors studied and assessed the structure of the natural and physical capital of this rural region. Also, for a complete assessment of the current state of the main performance indicators, an analysis of the income structure of these farms for the current year is given. The authors determined the degree of uniformity (not uniformity) of the distribution of agricultural land and livestock.

Conclusions – the study showed that the majority of private subsidiary farms in the Damsinsky rural district of the Akmola region are either engaged in agricultural production to a small extent or produce agricultural products only for their own consumption and belong to the category of "nonmarketable" household plots. The low level of development of their marketability is determined by such factors as high cost of fodder, lack of independent fodder harvesting, lack of pasture lands around settlements and the high level of their degradation today.

1. Osipenko, A. E. (2016) Analiz ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti lichnykh podsobnykh khoziaistv v usloviiakh Rubtsovskogo raiona Altaiskogo krai. [Analysis of the economic efficiency of personal subsidiary farms in the conditions of the Rubtsovsky district of the Altai Territory]. Molodoi uchenyi. Young Scientist, 2016, № 1 (105), 276-279 [in Russian].

2. Voitleva, Z.A. (2019) Razvitie mnogoukladnosti v selskom khoziaistve: regionalnyi aspect [Development of multiculturalism in agriculture: regional aspect].Vestnik MGTU. Trudy Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. - Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University. Proceedings of the Murmansk State Technical University, V. 22, № 3, 421-431[in Russian].

3. Vorobyova V.V., Bugay Y.A. (2020) Personal Subsidiary Farms in the Food Supply System of the Altai Krai. 2020 International Scientific and Practical Forum on Natural Resources, the Environment, and Sustainability, NRES 2020, Japan, Тokio, 670(1), 65-78.

4. Kuhar, V. Kot, E., Loretts, O. (2020) Analysis of the effectiveness of state support to farms in region of Russia. The case of sverdlovsk region. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 11(3), 676-681.

5. Shinet, G.G. Zhadigerova, G.,A. Yesbolova, A.Y., Andarova, R.K., Zhussipova, E.E. (2020) Role and development of personal husbandries in solving employment issues in the region. Bulletin of Karaganda University. Economy Series, V. 100, № 4, 131-141.

6. Umbetaliev, N.A. (2018) Development of small business in AIC. Problems of AgriMarket, № 2, 74-81.

7. Kaliyev, G.A. Sabirova, A.I., Akimbekova, G.U., Glushan, L.A., Zhildikbaeva, A.N. (2019) Organizational-economic directions of the effective use of supply chain strategy in rural territories of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 868-873

8. Kalykova, B. (2020) Rural territories of Kazakhstan: realities, problems and solutions. Problems of AgriMarket, № 3, 209-215.

9. Prokhorova, V.V., Klochko, E.N., Kolomyts, O.N., Gladilin, A.V. (2016) Prospects of the agro-industrial complex development: Economic diversification, business development, mono-industry town strengthening and expansion. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(6), 159-164.

10. Kaldiyarov, D.A., Lemechshenko, O.V. (2019) Socio-economic aspects of rural development. Problems of AgriMarket, № 2, 167-171.