Competitiveness of livestock farming: an ESG assessment in the context of the digital economy

The objective – is to evaluate the efficiency of the livestock sector and identify directions for strengthening its competitiveness by taking into account ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors within the context of the digital economy, which is particularly relevant in light of global challenges and the transformation of the business environment.

Methods – comparative analysis, financial and economic analysis, and a systematic examination of ESG criteria were employed to identify differences and common trends and to verify the reliability of accounting information.

Results – the study demonstrates the impact of digital technologies, including digital control systems, on the operation of livestock enterprises, enabling greater accuracy in managerial decision-making. The principal socioeconomic and environmental priorities for optimizing the livestock sector were identified. The interrelationship between accounting tools, auditing, business investment, and ESG assessment was substantiated, strengthening the conceptual foundation of management. It was demonstrated that the implementation of digital innovations enhances transparency, reduces risks, and improves the quality of organizational decision-making.

Conclusions indicate the necessity of the systematic application of ESG indicators, the improvement of environmental reporting, the digitalization of expert assessment, and the use of integrated accounting and analytical models. The practical implementation of the proposed approaches will strengthen the investment attractiveness of the livestock sub-sector, contribute to capacity enhancement and stakeholder engagement, while standardized ESG parameters and the promotion of innovation activity will support the formation of sustainable supply chains and ensure dynamic economic growth in both the regions and the production sector. The implementation of ESG standards plays an important role in the development of the industry, contributes to improving the financial performance of agricultural enterprises, creates favorable conditions for attracting investors and maintaining a strong reputation in domestic and international markets, and promotes the preservation of biological and natural diversity.

1. Baidakov, A.K., Sarsembaeva, G.B. & Vakhrushina, M.A. (2025). Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravlencheskogo ucheta zatrat v rastenievodstve [Improvement of the Management Cost Accounting System in Crop Production]. Problemy agrorynka - Problems of AgriMarket, 4, 69–79 [in Russian].

2. Korabayev, B., Amanova, G., Abuselidze, G., Saduakassova, K. & Bekbulatova, A. (2024). Analysis and Challenges of the Formative and Accumulative Process of Industrial Residues. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(2), 155–170 [in English].

3. Nurgaliyeva, A., Korabayev, B., Matenova, Z., Zeinullina, A. & Sartova, R. (2021). Priorities of Application of High Technologies in Industry on the Principles of Greening. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 6(394), 120–130 [in English].

4. Korabayev, B., Amanova, G., Akimova, B., Saduakassova, K. & Nurgaliyeva, A. (2023). The Model of Environmental Accounting and Auditing as a Factor in Increasing the Efficiency of Management Decisions at Industrial Enterprises in Kazakhstan. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(4), 987–1003 [in English].

5. Kalieva, N., Amanova, G., Mugauina, R. & Korabayev, B. (2025). Assessment of Digital Transformation of Agro-Industrial Complex Enterprises in Kazakhstan: Innovative and Ecological Aspects. Bulletin of Atyrau University Named after Kh. Dosmukhamedov, 1, 78–89 [in English].

6. Abuselidze, G., Zharlikenova, A. & Korabayev, B.A. (2026). A Conceptual Framework for Risk-Adjusted Investment Attractiveness Assessment of Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(3), Article 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19030201 [in English].

7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Digital Agriculture Report (2022). Available at: https://www.fao.org (date of access: 10.03.2026) [in English].

8. World Bank. Agriculture and Food Global Practice (2021). Available at: https://www.worldbank.org (date of access: 10.03.2026) [in English].

9. Porter, M.E.& Kramer, M.R. (2021). Creating Shared Value: A Review and Update. Harvard Business Review, 99(1–2), 78–88 [in English].

10. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (2020). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance (Updated Insights for the Digital Era). Harvard Business Review, 98(3), 64-72 [in English].

11. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IAS 41 Agriculture (2020). Available at: https://www.ifrs.org (date of access: 10.03.2026) [in English].

12. Biuro natsional'noi statistiki Agentstva po strategicheskomu planirovaniyu i reformam Respubliki Kazakhstan [Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan] (2025). Available at: https://www.stat.gov.kz (date of access: 10.03.2026) [in Russian].

13. Ministerstvo sel'skogo khozyaistva Respubliki Kazakhstan [Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan] (2025). Available at: https://www.gov.kz (date of access: 11.03.2026) [in Russian].

14. KPMG. ESG Reporting and Agriculture (2023). Available at: https://www.home.kpmg (date of access: 11.03.2026) [in English].

15. PwC. Sustainability and ESG in Agribusiness (2022). Available at: https://www.pwc.com (date of access: 11.03.2026) [in English].