FACTORS AFFECTING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ETHNIC MIGRANTS IN AGRICULTURE

The author notes that the study of issues of modern migration processes in the country, the analysis of the scales, directions and factors determining them, the definition of various as-pects of the impact of migration on the state of agriculture are relevant and timely. The economet-ric model is presented to identify stable variables that affect the employment of ethnic migrants in agricultural production. Econometric analysis showed that the main factors which influence on ethnic migrants in agriculture are as follows: the place of residence, the level of education, age and satisfaction with life in the countryside. In agriculture of the Akmola region, mainly middle-aged ethnic migrants are employed, with education below the secondary vocational level, living in rural areas, who do not want to change their place of residence in short term period.

agriculture, migration processes, ethnic migrant, econometric model, employment, working conditions, infrastructure, level of education, employment. Тұтқалы сөздер: ауыл шаруашылығы, миграциялық үдерістер, этникалық көші-қон, эконометрикалық модель, жұмыспен қамтылу, еңбек жағдайы, инфрақұрылым, білім деңгейі, жұмысқа орналастыру. Ключевые слова: сельское хозяйство, миграционные процессы, этнический мигрант, эко-нометрическая модель, занятость, условия труда, инфраструктура, уровень образо-вания, трудоустройство

1. Tauer, L. (1995). Age and Farmer Pro-ductivity. Review of Agricultural Economics, 17(1), 63-69. Retrieved from.

2. Haq Abu Zafar Mahmudul, The Role of Farmers' Education on Income in Bangladesh.

3. Jamison, D.T., & Lau, L.J.(1982). Farmer education and farm efficiency. Published for the World Bank [by] Johns Hopkins University Press.

4. Jamison, D.T., & Moock, P.R. (1984). Farmer education and farm efficiency in Nepal: The role of schooling, extension services, and cognitive skills // World Development. - 1982. - Vol.12 (1).- Р.67-86.

5. Lau, L. J., &Yotopoulos, P. A. (1971). A test for relative efficiency and application to Indi-an agriculture. The American Economic Review, 94-109.

6. Lockheed, M. E., Jamison, T., & Lau, L. J. Farmer education and farm efficiency: A survey. Economic development and cultural change. - 1980. - Vol.29 (1). - P. 37-76.

7. Monke, E.A., & Pearson, S.R. (1989). The policy analysis matrix for agricultural develop-ment (No. 04; HD1415, M5.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

8. Phillips, J. M. (1994). Farmer education and farmer efficiency: A meta-analysis // Eco-nomic Development and Cultural Change. - 1994. - Vol.43(1). - P. 149-165.

9. Randall, A. Resource economics. - New York. - 1987. - Р.189-228

10. Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. K., & Thijssen, G. J. Environmental efficiency with multiple envi-ronmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA // European Journal of Oper-ational Research. - 2000. - Vol.121(2). - P. 287-303.

11. Richard Bidlack. Russia and Eurasia 2015-2016 // Rowman& Littlefield. - 2015. - P. 138-139.